Agreement in Brazilian Portuguese copular sentences

Authors

  • Patrícia Rodrigues Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Paraná, Brasil
  • Maria José Foltran Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Paraná, Brasil

Keywords:

agreement, bare nominal, copula

Abstract

This work is concerned with copular clauses in Brazilian Portuguese like Mulher(es) é complicado, in which the predicate exhibits an unmarked form for gender and number (masculine singular), in spite of the feminine and/or plural form of the noun in the subject constituent. We reject the analyses that propose (i) there is a hidden infinitive in the subject position, (ii) the agreement is an instance of semantic agreement, and (iii) the DP subject would be in an A-bar position. We argue that the subject is a nominal that lacks index features, used in the external agreement (WECHSLER, 2011; DANON, 2012; DUEK, 2012; FOLTRAN; RODRIGUES, 2013).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DANON, G. Nothing to Agree on? Non-agreeing subjects of copular clauses in Hebrew. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, v. 1-2, n. 59, p. 85-108, 2012.

DOBROVIE-SORIN, C.; PIRES DE OLIVEIRA, R. Reference to kinds in Brazilian Portuguese: definite singulars vs bare singulars. In: GRØNN, Atle (Org.). Proceedings of SuB 12. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2008. p. 107-121.

DOWTY, D. Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection. Language, v. 67, n. 3, p. 546-619, 1991.

DUEK, K. Bare nouns and gender agreement in Brazilian Portuguese. Paper presented at CLS 48, April 19-21, 2012.

ENGER, H-O. Scandinavian pancake sentences as semantic agreement. Journal of Linguistics, Cambridge, v. 27, n. 1, p. 5-34, 2004.

FAARLUND, J. T. Embedded clause reduction and Scandinavian gender agreement. Journal of Linguistics, v. 13, p. 239–57, 1977.

FOLTRAN, M. J.; RODRIGUES, P. On denoting abstract entities. Revista da Abralin, v. 12, n. 1, p. 269-291, 2013.

HEIM, I. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. 1982. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1982.

KATHOL, A. Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. In: LEVINE, R.; GREEN, G. (Org.). Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 223-274.

MARTIN, J. W. Gênero? Revista Brasileira de Linguística. n. 2, p. 3-8, 1975. Disponível em: <http://people.ufpr.br/~borges/publicacoes/notaveis/Genero.pdf>. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2013.

MÜLLER, A. The semantics of generic quantification in Brazilian Portuguese. Probus, v. 14, p. 279-298, 2002.

PIRES DE OLIVEIRA, R.; ROTHSTEIN, S,.Bare Singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua, v. 121, p. 2153-2175, 2011.

POLLARD, C.; SAG I. Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: CSLI Publications. 1994.

ROY, I. Nonverbal predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

SASSE, H.J. Syntactic categories and subcategories. In: JACOBS, J. et al. (Org.). Syntax Ein internationals Handbuchzeitgen össischer Forschung. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1993. p. 646-686.

SCHMITT, C.; MUNN, A. The syntax and semantics of bare arguments in Brazilian Portuguese. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, v. 2, p. 253–281. 2002.

WECHSLER, S. The structure of Swedish pancakes. Talk given at CSSP 2011, Université Paris 8. 2011. Disponível em: <https://sites.google.com/site/wechslerpublications/presentations>. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2013.

WECHSLER, S.; ZLATIC, L. The many faces of agreement. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2003.

Published

2015-04-21

How to Cite

Rodrigues, P., & Foltran, M. J. (2015). Agreement in Brazilian Portuguese copular sentences. Estudos Linguísticos (São Paulo. 1978), 43(01), 477–488. Retrieved from https://revistadogel.emnuvens.com.br/estudos-linguisticos/article/view/453

Issue

Section

Sintaxe