Marcas de uso diastráticas nos dicionários do PNLD: tabuísmo e chulismo

Diastratic usage labels in PNLD dictionaries: tabooism and vulgarism

Authors

  • Fábio Henrique de Carvalho Bertonha Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-4302
  • Claudia Zavaglia Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0250-7019

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21165/el.v51i1.3306

Abstract

This paper broaches two diastract labels related to tabooism and vulgarism (respectively, abbreviated as Tabu. and chul) present in four dictionaries inserted in the PNLD 2012: Dicionários, namely: (i) Type 3 – Saraiva Jovem (2010) and Aurélio Júnior (FERREIRA, 2011); (ii) Type 4 – Novíssimo Aulete Lexicon (GEIGER, 2011) and Dicionário Houaiss Conciso (HOUAISS; VILLAR, 2011). Based on Fajardo (1997), Strehler (1998), Welker (2004), Pontes (2009) and Gutiérrez Cuadrado (2011), we intend to analyze diastract labels available in this corpus and distributed in nine microstructures of following entries: bicha, borrar, bunda, cagar, cu, foder, rabo, trepar and veado. We found different labels are used in the same entry depending on the type of dictionary
Keywords: PNLD’s dictionaries; labels; tabooism and vulgarism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-05-31

How to Cite

Bertonha, F. H. de C., & Zavaglia, C. (2022). Marcas de uso diastráticas nos dicionários do PNLD: tabuísmo e chulismo: Diastratic usage labels in PNLD dictionaries: tabooism and vulgarism. Estudos Linguísticos (São Paulo. 1978), 51(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.21165/el.v51i1.3306

Issue

Section

Artigos